Blogs

Lunch With a Leader | Chapter 1: Marcelo Menezes

Welcome to Lunch With a Leader, where the Tech & Data People team sits down with IT leaders to uncover their career insights, challenges, and industry perspectives. Each conversation brings valuable lessons, trends, and advice to help our community grow and thrive.


Grab a seat at the table and take in the insights from some of the best in the business.


The digital landscape is constantly evolving, demanding leaders who are highly skilled and relentlessly curious. As a Digital Portfolio Leader, staying ahead of emerging trends is an endless task – one that Marcelo Menezes doesn’t just embrace but actively drives. Through strategic thinking, industry influence, and fostering a culture of continuous learning, he ensures his teams remain at the forefront of innovation.


I was eager to understand how he navigates this fast-moving space, what drives his leadership style, and the advice he has for those looking to step up into a ‘Head Of’ role. Here's what he shared.


The mindset of a future-ready digital leader

1. How do you stay on top of emerging digital trends and tech?

If there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that the digital world never stands still. That's why I prioritise staying curious and informed about emerging trends. It's not just about keeping up, it's about ensuring I can deliver the best possible solutions for my stakeholders. It’s also about being intentional in how you learn. I've found that listening to leaders in the product space, particularly those in Silicon Valley, provides invaluable insights. Their perspectives on product management, digital capabilities, and AI are truly shaping the future. If you're looking for a great resource, I highly recommend Martin Cagan's "Transformed: Moving the Product Operating Model". It's been an eye-opener and a game-changer for me.


2. What key metrics do you track to ensure your digital portfolio drives real business impact?

To ensure my digital portfolio delivers meaningful business impact, strategic alignment with product teams is paramount. We don’t just measure progress - we make sure our efforts directly support business goals.


We begin by understanding their key performance indicators (KPIs) and objectives and key results (OKRs). For example, if a product's success is measured by a 30% increase in business Net Promoter Score (NPS), then our delivery must be directly tied to achieving that outcome.

While delivery velocity and feature throughput are important, they are internal metrics.

True success lies in delivering the right solutions that drive measurable business results. That’s why we're actively embedding OKRs to drive a culture shift towards outcome-based performance, shifting the focus from outputs to real-world outcomes and impact.


3. How do you foster collaboration across teams to keep digital projects on track and delivering results?

In my experience, the most effective collaboration arises from psychological safety. When team members feel safe, empowered and trusted to make decisions (and even mistakes), they naturally work together.



Creating this environment is a key priority for me, as it directly impacts our ability to deliver results. While tools like MS Teams and Slack are essential, they're only effective when built upon a foundation of psychological safety. 

True collaboration isn't forced; it's fostered.

More broadly, organisations that prioritise this kind of environment see higher organic collaboration and prevent the formation of silos.


4. When it comes to ROI, how do you measure success and communicate value to senior leadership?

ROI isn't a one-size-fits-all metric. It shifts dramatically depending on your industry.


Within my organisation - a finance business - we're naturally driven by financial returns. However, if you're in an innovation-focussed company, ROI might be measured by the number of prototypes launched or speed-to-market.


The key takeaway? As a digital leader, you need to understand your business inside and out. That's how you know what senior leadership is looking for and how you can deliver real ROI. Just look at Zappos. They recognised that customer service tenure was their competitive advantage, which led to their $1.2 billion acquisition by Amazon. That kind of strategic thinking is what defines real business impact.


5. What’s one risk you’re constantly thinking about, and how do you manage it?

Rapid deployment is a powerful advantage in digital, however it must be strategically managed.


Prioritising speed over security and brand integrity can have severe consequences, especially for established brands. Maintaining customer trust and loyalty is non-negotiable.


That’s why I believe speed-to-market should never be a tech only decision. It should be achieved through close collaboration between business, technology, digital, and data teams, ensuring a balanced and secure approach to innovation.


6.  And finally, for those looking to step into a Head of Portfolio Management role - what’s your top piece of advice?

The best digital leaders aren’t just experts in technology; they’re also great students of the business.

Especially in industries like finance, success comes from connecting the dots between digital innovation and the organisation's core challenges. Don't be afraid to learn from those who have been there longer—they often have a wealth of business knowledge.



And remember, empathy is a solid point of difference. Understanding the problems your business is trying to solve allows you to build stronger relationships and have a greater impact.


As the digital landscape continues to evolve, leaders like Marcelo, who prioritise continuous learning, strategic alignment, and human-centric approaches, will be the driving force behind successful transformations. His insights serve as a valuable guide for aspiring leaders, showing that real success lies not just in keeping pace with change, but in driving it.




Aidan Quieros

State Lead, VIC

A computer chip is sitting on top of a purple motherboard.
By Kara Porter July 17, 2025
Spoiler: “Competitive salary” isn’t the hook you think it is.
By Kara Porter July 7, 2025
Welcome to Lunch with a Leader, where the Tech & Data People team sits down with IT leaders to uncover their career insights, challenges, and industry perspectives. Each conversation brings valuable lessons, trends, and advice to help our community grow and thrive. Grab a seat at the table and take in the insights from some of the best in the business.
By Kara Porter June 11, 2025
Welcome to Lunch with a Leader, where the Tech & Data People team sits down with IT leaders to uncover their career insights, challenges, and industry perspectives. Each conversation brings valuable lessons, trends, and advice to help our community grow and thrive. Grab a seat at the table and take in the insights from some of the best in the business. 
By Kara Porter June 3, 2025
Why the way you brief, partner, and align at the top matters more than ever.
By Kara Porter May 11, 2025
Welcome to Lunch with a Leader, where the Tech & Data People team sits down with IT leaders to uncover their career insights, challenges, and industry perspectives. Each conversation brings valuable lessons, trends, and advice to help our community grow and thrive. Grab a seat at the table and take in the insights from some of the best in the business. 
A row of cars are driving down a city street at night. Ambient Intelligence.
By Kara Porter May 8, 2025
We’ve entered an era where the smartest systems aren’t the loudest. they’re the ones you don’t even notice. Ambient Intelligence (AmI), or “ambient invisible intelligence,” is reshaping how we live and work, not with fanfare, but with subtlety. This is AI that whispers instead of shouts. It learns your habits, senses your environment, and responds without you lifting a finger. It’s the kind of intelligence that anticipates, not interrupts. So… why should tech professionals, recruiters, and business leaders care? What Is Ambient Intelligence (AmI), Really? Ambient intelligence refers to digital systems—AI, sensors, and networks—that are embedded into our environments to support humans quietly and contextually. Think beyond chatbots and flashy dashboards. This is: Smart lighting that adjusts based on mood or weather Healthcare systems that flag early symptoms before patients notice Cybersecurity that auto-defends without alert fatigue Enterprise tools that prioritise tasks based on your unique working patterns. It’s a tech layer that fades into the background. That is, until you realise you couldn’t function without it. A Silent Revolution in the Workplace Here’s the interesting bit: Ambient AI isn’t just for homes and smart cities. It’s quietly infiltrating our workplaces. Talent Platforms that serve candidates content before they search. Meeting Software that understands conversation flow and adjusts transcripts, follow-ups, or even sentiment analysis in real time. Facilities Management tools that adjust airflow, lighting, and noise levels based on occupancy and stress indicators. And all of this happens without user prompts. We’ve moved from “Hey Siri” to “Siri already knows.” Why It Matters for Tech Recruitment Let’s talk talent. As ambient intelligence grows, we’ll see rising demand for: AI/ML engineers with human-centred design experience Data privacy and ethics specialists IoT security experts UX professionals who understand invisible design Integration architects who can make fragmented systems feel cohesive. And here’s the catch: these roles often require cross-functional fluency. Tech meets psychology, meets ethics, meets design. Are we ready for that shift? Ethical Design in the Background There’s power in invisibility. But there’s risk too. When tech becomes ambient, it also becomes less visible to scrutiny. That means: Bias can go unchecked Data privacy can slip through the cracks Users can be nudged without realising it. The question is no longer can we do this? —But should we? Smart businesses will bring in people who can answer that. Invisible, but Intentional The future of AI isn’t a robot in the boardroom. It’s the algorithm silently removing barriers before they appear. Ambient intelligence is already here. You may have just not noticed it. Yet.
By Kara Porter April 11, 2025
Welcome to Lunch with a Leader, where the Tech & Data People team sits down with IT leaders to uncover their career insights, challenges, and industry perspectives. Each conversation brings valuable lessons, trends, and advice to help our community grow and thrive.  Grab a seat at the table and take in the insights from some of the best in the business.
A group of people are connected to each other in a network.
By Kara Porter March 26, 2025
Growing a tech team goes a little more in-depth than just getting bums on seats. That is, if you want to scale efficiently. As businesses expand, they often face a common dilemma: should they build an in-house team, buy talent through hiring full-time employees, or partner with external agencies and contractors? Each approach has its pros and cons, and choosing the right one depends on factors like budget, project scope, and long-term business goals. The Build, Buy or Partner Framework When to build (upskill & develop internal talent) Best for: Companies with existing talent that can be developed for long-term growth. Pros: Retains institutional knowledge Fosters a strong company culture Reduces external hiring costs over time. Cons: Takes time and investment in training Can be challenging if internal talent lacks specialised skills. When to choose this approach: When you have a solid foundation of junior-to-mid-level employees who can be trained When you’re looking to promote from within and build long-term loyalty When hiring budgets are tight, but internal development is feasible. When to buy (hire full-time employees directly or through an agency) Best for: Businesses needing stability and long-term expertise in critical roles. Pros: Provides dedicated resources fully committed to company goals Helps establish a strong, cohesive team culture. Cons: Lengthy hiring processes if running a direct process Higher upfront costs (salary, benefits, onboarding, training) Risk of turnover. When to choose this approach: When core business functions require in-house expertise (e.g., software engineers, DevOps, cybersecurity specialists) When long-term stability outweighs short-term cost savings When hiring in a talent-competitive industry where full-time employment is a key attractor. When to partner (contractors and recruitment agencies) Best for: Businesses needing flexibility, speed, or niche expertise. Pros: Faster time-to-hire, especially for specialised roles Cost-effective for short-term projects Access to a broader talent pool. Cons: Cultural integration can be trickier if partners aren’t well-briefed on your values and team dynamics May carry higher long-term costs but manageable with a strong partner who can help you strike the right balance with lasting talent. When to choose this approach: When working on short-term projects that don’t justify full-time hires When needing specialised skills that are difficult to recruit in-house When scaling rapidly and requiring immediate talent solutions When the target talent requires a more strategic brand positioning. Making the Right Hiring Decision Assess business goals: Align hiring strategy with long-term company objectives. Evaluate current team capabilities: Determine whether upskilling is an option before going to market. Consider cost vs. speed: Weigh the urgency of hiring needs against budget constraints. Mix & match approaches: A hybrid approach—combining direct hires with external partners—can offer the best balance of cost, flexibility, and expertise. Scaling a tech team effectively requires a strategic mix of building, buying, and partnering. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each approach, hiring managers can make informed decisions that support both immediate needs and long-term growth. Get in touch with our team to see how we can help set your business up for efficient and effective hiring.
By Kara Porter March 4, 2025
When it comes to creating a thriving workforce, employee engagement and employee experience are often used interchangeably. However, while they may seem similar on the surface, they are two distinct concepts that are crucial to the overall health and success of an organisation. Understanding the difference between the two—and how they interact—can help employers build a more engaged, satisfied and productive team. What is Employee Engagement? Employee engagement refers to the emotional commitment an employee has to their organisation. It’s the level of enthusiasm and dedication that an employee brings to their role. Engaged employees are motivated, passionate about their work, and actively contribute to the company's success. Engagement is more about the intensity and quality of work rather than job satisfaction alone. In Australia, only 15% of employees are actively engaged in their roles, according to Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace 2022 report. While this is a global statistic, it’s clear that engagement levels remain low. What does this mean for Australian employers? It indicates a significant opportunity to invest in practices that can turn disengaged employees into highly motivated, committed individuals. Key characteristics of engaged employees include: Motivation: They are driven to do their best work every day. Passion: They care deeply about the company’s goals and values. Commitment: They are invested in the long-term success of the company. High productivity: Engaged employees tend to be more productive and efficient. What is Employee Experience? Employee experience, on the other hand, encompasses the entire journey of an employee with a company. From the moment they apply for a job, to their first day on the job, to their interactions with colleagues, and their day-to-day work life, employee experience is shaped by all touchpoints and interactions an employee has within the organisation. It’s more holistic and takes into account every aspect of an employee’s work life, both physical and emotional. In Australia, 73% of HR leaders agree that employee experience plays a critical role in employee engagement, according to The Australian HR Institute (AHRI) . However, it’s not just about the work environment; it’s about creating an experience where employees feel valued, supported and equipped to succeed. As 76% of employees are willing to leave their current employer for one that offers a better experience, the need for organisations to focus on improving the employee experience is more important than ever. Key factors that make up the employee experience include: Work environment: The physical and psychological aspects of the workplace (including flexibility, office design and culture) Onboarding: The process of introducing new employees to the company and setting them up for success. Company culture: The overall atmosphere, values, and norms within the organization. Professional development: Opportunities for growth, learning, and career advancement. Work-life balance: How well an organization supports employees in balancing work responsibilities with personal life. A side by side comparison While engagement focuses on the emotional commitment of an employee, experience covers the broader scope of their time with the company. Here’s how they differ:
By Kara Porter February 26, 2025
Every time you shop online, stream music, or even scroll through social media, you feed AI with valuable data. Your preferences, behaviours and interactions fuel machine learning models that personalise your experience. But here’s the catch - you don’t own that data anymore. Big tech companies and enterprises are leveraging AI at an unprecedented scale, using consumer data to train sophisticated models for recommendation engines, facial recognition and even autonomous decision-making. And while AI-driven convenience is undeniable, the question remains: Who really owns your data? And do you have a say in how it’s used? The silent transaction: Your data for AI training AI thrives on data. The more it collects, the smarter it gets. But the transparency around this exchange is murky at best. Most terms of service agreements (those lengthy documents we all ignore!) grant companies broad permissions to collect, store and utilise user data for AI development. Take AI-powered chatbots or voice assistants. Every interaction refines their ability to respond more naturally. But what happens to those recordings? Where is that text data stored? More importantly, can you ever opt out once your data has already been used to train an AI model? The growing push for AI transparency Consumer trust in AI is on shaky ground. According to recent studies, 68% of consumers don’t trust companies to use their data responsibly . Data breaches, algorithmic biases and the rise of deepfake technology have only heightened concerns. Governments are starting to take action. The EU’s AI Act and frameworks like Australia’s Privacy Act Review aim to regulate how AI handles personal data. However, legislation is always playing catch-up with technology, leaving users in a grey area. What this means for businesses For businesses leveraging AI, consumer trust is the new currency. If customers feel like their data is being exploited without consent, they will disengage. Brands that prioritise transparency - by giving users control over their data, explaining AI decision-making, and ensuring ethical AI practices - will be the ones that thrive. Here’s what businesses should consider: Data consent: Make it clear when and how consumer data is being used for AI Explainability: If AI-driven recommendations or decisions impact users, explain the "why" behind them Opt-out mechanisms: Give users a way to remove their data from AI training sets. So…who really owns your data? Right now, companies do. But should they? As AI continues to evolve, the demand for data ownership, transparency and user control will only grow. The businesses that listen—and act—will be the ones that earn lasting consumer trust. What do you think? Should consumers have more control over how AI uses their data?